VP6 vs. BP6

marqus · Post by **marqus** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:41 am

Hi,

why not using the VP6? It supports FCPGa Chips an 133FSB without any mods. Is there a major disadvantage with that board?

thanx,
Marqus

Dave Rave · Post by **Dave Rave** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:53 am

no probs at all.
you might say, we are original purists for the 'first' dual processor board to run original celerons.

the VP6 is just an evolution and is designed for proper Pentium chips.

if you had a VP6, you wouldn't waste a 533 celeron in it, you'd get Piii 1.133's
dya see ?

davd_bob · Post by **davd_bob** » Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:47 am

Dave Rave wrote:no probs at all.
you might say, we are original purists for the 'first' dual processor board to run original celerons.

the VP6 is just an evolution and is designed for proper Pentium chips.

if you had a VP6, you wouldn't waste a 533 celeron in it, you'd get Piii 1.133's
dya see ?

P-III 1.133 in Dual (over 2.2Ghz) with LOTS of ram.
The only way to make it better is get a FC-PGA2 dual board with DDR...but then you wouldn't "belong" on BP6.com. You would still be a welcome guest...just not a family member.